Cutting through political noise

Some Facts On Water For World Water Day

March 22, 2009 at 1:53 PM | By Matthew Gagnon

Want to know why your water is so fresh and clean and you don’t have to worry about dying from water diseases, like people in third world countries do?  Chew on this:

GOOD: Drinking Water

March 22, 2009 at 1:50 PM | By Matthew Gagnon

GOOD: Crocodile Mile (Dirty Version)

March 22, 2009 at 1:47 PM | By Matthew Gagnon

GOOD: Cool Hand Luke (Dirty Version)

March 22, 2009 at 1:47 PM | By Matthew Gagnon

GOOD: Psycho Shower Scene (Dirty Version)

March 22, 2009 at 1:46 PM | By Matthew Gagnon

Back In Action

March 22, 2009 at 1:45 PM | By Matthew Gagnon

Ladies and Gentlemen, first of all - my apologies.

I had intended to continue my series on the GOP and race continuously, but had to take a short break from blogging for a while.

Why? Well - I’ve been busy at work - true story.

What have I been doing? Well, glad you asked. I’ve been working on getting ready for today’s festivities at World Water Day 2009.  Its been a lot of work, but it is for a great cause, so I hope you’ll all forgive me for taking a short break to work on it.  I promise I’ll continue my series as soon as possible.

So, to give you all an idea why this is important, stay tuned - I’ll be posting four great videos that should certainly explain a few things!

Back to politics as usual on Monday!  And happy World Water Day everyone…

The Most Bizzare Logic In History

March 3, 2009 at 4:01 PM | By Matthew Gagnon

So, Claire - let me get this straight.

Barack Obama inherited this problem.  Part of the problem was the wasteful spending, out of control earmarks, and irresponsible deficits of the Republican led Congress.  She seems to almost enjoy going back to the Bush administration and twisting the knife and beating the drum on the excesses of Republicanism.

What Thune doesn’t push back on, is the hypocrisy of her rhetoric.

If those excesses were such a sin, what in the living hell do you call what has happened in January and February?

I did rather enjoy watching McClaskill blather on, and at the same time, watching John Thune’s face.  Completely unimpressed with the nonsensical rantings coming out of her mouth, his face was made of complete stone.  Absolute stone.  Spoke more than words ever could have.

Democrats are going down the wrong path here.  If you want to attack the Republicans for waste, spending and deficits (which is justified), you had damned well better walk the walk yourself - not take the problem they created and multiply it ten fold.

Eventually, if you keep that nonsense up, somebody is going to call you on it.

The Black Republican Party (GOP And Race Volume 1)

March 3, 2009 at 1:40 PM | By Matthew Gagnon

Contrary to what most people in political circles believe, the existence of the Republican Party was not always defined by limited government rhetoric and social conservatism.

Talk radio hosts are rather fond of saying, “conservatives win when they are real conservatives” as though the current makeup of political war has always been as it is now.  Nothing could be further from the truth - so when you hear that, try to keep in mind you’re listening to somebody who doesn’t study much party history and has no interest in facts.

In the mid 1800s, when the Republican Party spawned itself as a third party, the battle lines were not drawn around high taxes or low taxes (especially since income taxation didn’t exist), big government or small government, deficits or balanced budgets - they were drawn around the defining issue of the time, slavery.

Indeed, the genesis of the party was opposition to the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which essentially was federal law intended to allow the spread of slavery into the new American territories.  Under the act, if the population of the western territories voted to institute the practice of slavery (a practice known as “popular sovereignty“), it was free to exist.  In essence, it repealed the Missouri compromise, which had created a “balance” of slave states and free, so as to not upset the status quo and incite a civil war over the issue. Read more

Republicans And Race

February 22, 2009 at 1:02 AM | By Matthew Gagnon

Over the course of the next two weeks, Political Capital will be examining the history of the Grand Old Party with a focus on the changing nature of its demographic appeal - most notably among African Americans.

It may surprise some to learn that it was not always labeled the “intolerant white male” party - indeed, for most of its history, it was the preferred political party of African Americans.

In the famous Lincoln-Douglas debates, Douglas would repeatedly refer to it as the “Black Republican Party”, and support among the community was nearly unbreakable.

So how did the party go from “Black Republicans” to the party of rich, old, white men exclusively?

Hint - its not because Democrats buy off the votes of the African American community.  That is an insulting and incorrect assumption that many Republicans tired of being labeled racists have believed for too long.

Yes, Democratic promises of assistance, government programs, and affirmative action have certainly helped, but its a much much deeper issue than that, which we will talk about more in the future.  If that were all it took, than basically every demographic should be in the Democratic column - it is obviously a lot more than that.

So, check back shortly - we hope you enjoy our analysis of what went wrong, why it went wrong, and what can be done to fix it.

Just How Unpopular Was President Bush?

February 17, 2009 at 5:56 PM | By Matthew Gagnon

We have short memories.  What we remember most recently tends to become our picture of reality, often times at the expense of the truth.

In regards to George W. Bush, polls have shown American’s do not approve of the job he has done as president for at least the last two years (more like three), so obviously the memory that is most burned into our heads is one of public dissatisfaction with the president.

Those of us who study this kind of stuff (ie geeks) see a tale of two presidencies - the first four years and the second.  The first four were wildly popular with the American people (at the time), and in the latter four, he was largely abandoned by the public. Read more

Chris Dodd Is In Trouble

February 11, 2009 at 6:10 PM | By Matthew Gagnon

Or, so it looks.

Happy Birthday President Reagan

February 6, 2009 at 4:58 PM | By Matthew Gagnon

How Long Until Gibbs Is Fired?

February 5, 2009 at 4:15 PM | By Matthew Gagnon

And yes - its a serious question. He was awful during the campaign as a spokesman, he’s been a DISASTER for Obama’s communication department, and this is just one of the many embarrassing moments.

My colleague Liz Mair has rightly made the comparison between this and this epic scene (starting around 2:20) from The West Wing.

Seriously though - he’s getting really bad.  And I mean this in a non-partisan way - he’s just awful.

Its kind of sad, but the last really great press secretary we had was Ari Fleischer.

Scott McClellan was just horrendous - such a cold, grumpy guy who was abrasive with the press and never had that ability to coolly spar with them. Dan Parino was uninspiring and always struck me as something of a lightweight - even if that isn’t fair, she just never seemed like a wolf prowling around the press room, which is something you need as a PS.

And now Gibbs. Oh my god in heaven. He bothered the living hell out of me as a surrogate for Obama, with his arrogant, smarmy looks on his face as he regurgitated rather absurd talking points - but now that he’s press secretary, and not just a professional critic anymore, he’s failing, and failing fast.

It has always been my firm belief that part of what eventually sunk George W. Bush was his failure to communicate - and without a Fleischer like Press Secretary to really act as a visible spokesman who oozed confidence, he was doomed.

Obama is losing every battle he is fighting right now, and he’s losing against a rather weak, impotent Republican Party. Gibbs is part of that reason, because at this point and time, he is little more than an absurd joke.

Tom Daschle Used To Drive His Own Car

February 5, 2009 at 10:51 AM | By Matthew Gagnon

More Mark Sanford Brilliance

February 4, 2009 at 12:27 PM | By Matthew Gagnon

keep looking »